class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide .title[ #
Filling in the Gaps
Verbal Autopsy and Cause of Death Assignment
] .author[ ### Yue Chu Jason Thomas & Sam Clark ] .institute[ ### HealMod Co-Laboratory Workshop ] .date[ ### Oct. 1st, 2024 ] --- # Motivation .center[<img src="img/tanz_coverage.png" style="width: 100%" />] Source: Causes of Deaths From Community Settings in Tanzania. Ministry of Health (2024) --- background-image: url("img/coverage_map.png") background-size: contain <div style="position: absolute; bottom: 0px"> <a href="https://www.who.int/data/data-collection-tools/score/dashboard#/"> Source: WHO Score Dashboard </a> </div> --- # Capacity to Register CoD .center[<img src="img/capacity.png" style="width: 75%" />] Source: "Global report on health data systems and capacity, 2020" [WHO](https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/339125/9789240018709-eng.pdf?sequence=1) --- # Implications & Solutions -- * Knowledge of the leading causes of death at the community/population level informs health polices and facilitates the evaluation of interventions. -- + It can take many years for civil registration and vital statistics systems to develop sufficient capacity. -- * **Verbal Autopsy** -- interviewing the decedent's next of kin or caregiver to gather data on the relevant symptoms and medical history. -- + Physicians can assign causes of death using the VA data. -- + Algorithms have also been developed to assign causes, providing an expedient solution for providing CoD information. --- # openVA Team .pull-left2[ <img src="img/openva.png" style="width: 75%" /> [openva.net](https::/openva.net) ] .pull-right2[ * Multidisciplinary team led by Sam Clark (Dept. of Sociology, OSU) * Support updates of the World Health Organization's Verbal Autopsy Instrument * **Develop algorithms** for assigning causes to VA data * Involved in VA data collection (with reference causes) * Validation studies * Software, training, and support VA data analysts ] --- class: slide-font-27 # InSilicoVA * InterVA -- popular VA algorithm that has been in service for 20+ years -- * **InSilicoVA** [(McCormick, Li, Clark, et al., 2016)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01621459.2016.1152191) -- developed to improve upon InterVA... -- + fully probabilistic model with a hierarchical structure that estimates - distribution of deaths by cause in the population (CSMF) - *probability of each cause* for individuals </br>(InterVA → "indeterminate") -- + provides uncertainty estimates at both the population and individual level -- + accounts for missing values in the data --- # Validation Studies & Reports [Natl. Cause of Death Validation Study (S. Africa)](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16549716.2023.2285105) * Can VA algorithms reproduce physician cause assignment? -- * Individual Level: Agree on Top Cause (Top 3) + InSilicoVA -- 51.6% (73.8%) + InterVA5 -- 48.2% (70.9%) + Tariff2 -- 51.2% (*not available*) -- * Population level: CSMF Accuracy + InSilicoVA -- 0.84 + InterVA5 -- 0.81 + Tariff2 -- 0.82 --- background-image: url("img/mrc_results.png") background-size: contain --- # Validation Studies & Reports [Tanzanian MoH Report's Key Findings]() * VA methodology works well; recommend scaling up to national level * "The best performing CCVA algorithm was InSilicoVA with a CSMF physician concordance of 83%. InSilicoVA also has an advantage over InterVA5 and Tariff2 in that it does not deliver undetermined results." (p. 50) --- # Moving Forward There are various ways of improving VA cause assignment using computer coded algorithms * Improving algorithm performance + symptom dependence + domain adaptation models * Use more information from the VA interview * Growing the body of VA data with reference causes to train algorithms/models + build knowledge on epidemiological differences across space & time